Autofocus speed and build quality is substantially better on the Nikon. Canon EF 70-200mm Ζ/2.8L IS USM ~$1,600. The Tamron is just slightly sharper than the Canon at Ζ/2.8, but stopping down to
Because of the f/2.8 maximum aperture, the Nikon Z 70-180mm f/2.8 focuses in dark conditions without any issue. Compared to an f/4 lens, it captures twice as much light. It also allows for the use of Nikonβs 1.4x and 2.0x teleconverters, giving you a 100-250mm f/4 and a 140-360mm f/5.6 respectively. Focus speed is worse with the
First i tried super expensive nikon 70-200 2.8E FL it was BAD. Could not get sharp photo to save my life at longer distances. No amount of AF tuning would fix it. Sent it back I got tamron G2 locally. It was fine . Better then nikon out of the box. Tuned with the TAP console and i was excellent all around.
Re: Tamron 70-180 f/2.8 on Nikon Z. In reply to sunnycal β’ May 5, 2020. Yes! it is a very great option for those who are looking for large aperture and lightweight lens. Without any sign that Tamron is making the native lenses for Z mount, it is a very tempting option for Z users. Jeff_0000's gear list:
As this image quality comparison shows, the 70-200 OS's predecessor, the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM II Macro Lens, performs better at f/2.8 and f/4 except at 200mm where the OS version holds a slight advantage. Expect a modest amount of CA (Chromatic Aberration) in full frame corners at 70mm f/2.8.
The 70-200mm f/2.8 class of fast telephoto zoom is (along with the fast standard zoom) one of the key workhorse lenses for the working photographer, and is used for a huge range of applications. From weddings and portraits, though events and journalism, to sports and wildlife, this lens will be a mainstay of many a professional, and therefore
5lddiy. 7ppywic46a.pages.dev/1287ppywic46a.pages.dev/5657ppywic46a.pages.dev/1977ppywic46a.pages.dev/5267ppywic46a.pages.dev/4007ppywic46a.pages.dev/3857ppywic46a.pages.dev/5387ppywic46a.pages.dev/163
nikon 70 200 f2 8 review
